jemy gatdula blog

on international economic law and natural law

21.9.12

Updated compilation of materials against the RH Bill

Here's an updated compilation of materials you can use in arguing against the RH Bill:

> No need for an RH Bill, now or ever
> RH, the academe, and human rights
> Contracepting common sense
> Some notes on Fr. Bernas' response to Bp. Reyes
> Comments on Fr. Bernas' RH Bill article
> Ethical reasoning about a legislation promoting contraception
> Snappy replies against condomics
> Snappy replies to condomics 2
> Snappy replies to condomics 3
> Contraception and natural law
> Wealth and the Catholic Church (response to Angsioco)
> Sex, lies, and the Catholic Church
> Reasons against RH
> Do the right thing: Oppose the RH Bill
> On kicking God out of government
> Why we must fight the RH Bill our way

Feel free to share with your friends.
Posted by jemy at 6:56 AM
Labels: constitutional law, contraception, international law, natural law, pro-life issues, religious freedom
Newer Post Older Post Home
View mobile version
"Have you ever bothered to think how absurd it is to leave one's Catholicism aside on entering a university, or a professional association, or a scholarly meeting, or Congress, as if you were checking your hat at the door?"

about jemy

My photo
jemy
is a lawyer specializing in international economic law and constitutional law. read public international law at cambridge. he is a lecturer at the university of asia and the pacific and is executive director of the philippine council for foreign relations. he also writes a weekly column for businessworld.
View my complete profile
e-mail me at jemygatdula@yahoo.com for comments, about consultancy work, to speak at your event, or appear on your program. join me at facebook or twitter.

essential reads

  • the holy see
  • liturgy of the hours
  • catholic online
  • businessworld
  • lauterpacht center
  • asean
  • wto

archive

  • ►  2019 (2)
    • ►  March (2)
  • ►  2017 (1)
    • ►  April (1)
  • ►  2016 (46)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (12)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2015 (46)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (7)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2014 (50)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2013 (51)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  July (8)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (8)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ▼  2012 (74)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ▼  September (11)
      • Flying
      • Again, Fr. Bernas is mistaken. Same with Fr. Aquino
      • Tolerance and reciprocity
      • Updated compilation of materials against the RH Bill
      • No need for an RH bill, now or ever
      • Still no to the Kasambahay Bill
      • No to the Kasambahay Bill
      • Some notes on Fr. Bernas' response to Bp. Reyes
      • US elections, the WTO, and trade
      • Ethical reasoning about a legislation promoting co...
      • RH, the academe, and human rights
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (9)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2011 (69)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (13)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2010 (69)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (8)
  • ►  2009 (112)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  July (15)
    • ►  June (15)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (14)
    • ►  March (19)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2008 (19)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  March (9)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2007 (9)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2006 (8)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (1)

Labels

  • asean (37)
  • bangsamoro issue (25)
  • book review (1)
  • china (22)
  • competition law (8)
  • conservatism (10)
  • constitutional law (127)
  • contraception (23)
  • divorce (3)
  • education (11)
  • federalism (1)
  • foreign policy (1)
  • fta (30)
  • international law (90)
  • kasambahay law (6)
  • law (1)
  • legal education (15)
  • marriage (17)
  • military (5)
  • natural law (56)
  • policy (134)
  • pro-life issues (55)
  • religious freedom (52)
  • rh law (20)
  • same sex marriage (20)
  • trade (66)
  • trade tripper businessworld (207)
  • video interview (4)
  • wto (40)

Popular Posts

the opinions expressed by the blogger are his alone and not necessarily of his affiliations
Awesome Inc. theme. Theme images by Lokibaho. Powered by Blogger.